Sunday, February 13, 2011
Saturday, February 12, 2011
BoxingUp
Simplified rearbeam attachement to hulls. Simplified rear beam, box section, easier to fit, easier to assemble, easier to build, easier to engineer. Stiffer connection to hulls ? Doubtfull, but seems like a good compromise for the moment. Rear beam sits 94cm over the designed waterline. I like the new cockpits, easy access into the hulls and easy to install convertible soft tops to get some shade and protection from weather. Also the flat decks seem to be better for installing solar panels ?!? or other attachments, like a possible removable extra bunk shuttle or long voyage storage shuttle, dinghy or whatever. I might take advantage of the flat decks and convert the mid beam to a box section too, no doubt it's going to make the build easier. I'm so looking forward to start building, however that may not happen on this continent.

Thursday, January 27, 2011
iPod???
The central pod might find its way back into the design, with a drop-down cockpit floor. Since it's a foam sandwich it should only add around 80kg to the structure.

Sunday, January 23, 2011
ShuttleOrNot
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Different
I've been pondering about the stuff people want to cram into a hull, sacrifice hydrodynamics, aerodynamics, hull height, weight, building hours you name it. When the weather is nice and warm you just don't go below decks, when the weather isn't nice you want to stay/sleep near the helm, also you want to be able to get out of the bunk super quickly. I'm trying to find a way to keep the hulls as clean as possible and draw up some alternative accomodations. We'll see.
Monday, October 11, 2010
TheSpawningGrounds
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



